CK

phinlee1 <phinlee1@qwe.com> wrote:
> CK <zsimo64@remivefrog.ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
>> "[ste parker]" <imaginey@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Aug 24, 4:16 pm, phinl...@qwe.com (phinlee1) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> i've only played about four missions. it plays like and other RTS
>>>> really.
>>>
>>> Exactly my thoughts from the beta, it's really nothing more than the
>>> original Starcraft at a higher resolution. As such, a bit
>>> disappointing, although I'm not sure what they could've done to
>>> freshen up the genre - but then, I'm not paid to design these
> > > things.
>>>
>>> --
>>> [
>>
>> Truth be told, I actually prefer Dawn of War as that had a good twist
> > to
>> the genre, basing it on squads instead of individual units.
>>
>> But Starcraft 2 is a very, very polished RTS and the missions have a
> > lot
>> of different ideas (can only attack at night, rising lava etc), and
> > the
>> different difficulty levels really give a different experience.
>>
>> However I imagine the meat of Starcraft 2 will be it's multiplayer,
>> which I'm not quite so keen on, and wanted to dip my toe with you lot
>> before facing the entire world!
>
> Hi CK, i tried to add you as a SC2 friend last night but i need some
> kinda code with your username otherwise i could use an email addy. is
> your one above valid (minus the frog)?
>
> I played the Lava level last night, it was quite enjoyable. The game
> has
> some promise. what difficulty are you playing. i'm on 'normal'
> ___________.
> GT: phinlee1


Yeah, email address is the right one, sans le frog, otherwise my
character code is 237.

I tried Hard, but 3 or 4 missions in I dropped it down a notch. I find
normal too easy, but Hard very challenging...